About Me

Name: M. E. Ward
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Royalty vs. Rags to Riches

 
Ironically, another great man was laid to rest on Saturday, without all the mainstream media love fest and fanfare.  Frank Fertitta Jr., a Texas native, arrived in Las Vegas in 1960 with $100 loan from a friend and knowing only two people: an aunt and an uncle.  He left this world as an executive at Station Casinos, with 18 Station properties across the Las Vegas Valley displaying messages honoring his life. 
 
His rise from bellman to executive is an inspirational story, but the real story is how he lived his life, how many lives he touched and his belief that “to whom much is given, much is expected.”
 
Unlike the trust-fund baby Ted Kennedy, who rode his family’s coattails into infamy and used other people’s money to redistribute wealth, Mr. Fertitta Jr. made his own money and used his own money to participate in charitable endeavors like the Bishop Gorman High School Development Corporation and served on the Foundation Board of St. Jude's Ranch for Children.
 
His son, Frank Fertitta III, said at the funeral, “It’s amazing to see so many people here 49 years later and how many lives he touched.” 
 
In the era of victimization and the word "charity" defined as being generous with someone else’s money, men like Frank Fertitta Jr. are a dying breed. I’m sure he will be greatly missed by all those he touched, but his legacy will live on. 
 
Hopefully, Ted Kennedy’s legacy of being a spoiled rotten brat who rose to become a bully and tyrant in the United States Senate died along with him.  
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Ain't [America] No More

 
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am1.html 
 
Officer Wesley Cheeks, Jr., tells a protestor at a town hall in Reston, VA that he can "charge you with whatever I want to charge you with" because he doesn't like the man's poster:
 
 
Officer Cheeks last comment, "It aint [America] no more," perhaps speaks volumes about the attitude many in our government have concering a citizen's right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. 
 
Ironcially, many of the comments on YouTube concerning this video have to do with the debate between socialism versus fascism.
 
For the sake of argument, let's define the terms, shall we?

fas⋅cism

[fash-iz-uhm]
–noun
1. (sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
 

so⋅cial⋅ism

[soh-shuh-liz-uhm]
–noun
1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
 
While many on the left like to call people like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity fascist, neither has the power Office Cheeks has to arrest someone and throw them in jail for violating a law he made up on the spot. Neither Limbaugh or Hannity can forcibly suppress opposition and criticism, or take over a bank or a car company and tell them how to run their company in order to benefit the country and not the shareholders.
 
Only members of government can be fascist or socialist, not commentators on the radio or T.V.  
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Civil War or Genocide


In her Las Vegas Review Journal column entitled, “Speak up when someone carries guns, urges violence to make a statement,” (August 20, 2009), Jane Ann Morrison wrote: “But it’s time to speak out against those who advocate genocide, encourage murder or tote guns at political speeches and town hall meetings.”

Genocide seems like an odd term to use in a discussion about individual liberties and how they pertain to the Second Amendment. Whether or not its “political theater,” as Jane describes to openly carry an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle on your back and a 9mm pistol on your hip to a political rally, as “Chris,” a well dressed African American, recently did in Phoenix, Arizona, is up for debate.  But, to link Chris to all the homicidal maniacs who’ve carried out or threatened dastardly deeds is an exercise in intellectual disingenuousness on Jane’s part, to say the least. 

The intellectual dishonestly on Jane’s part is such a stretch of the imagination that it would be the equivalent of calling Abraham Lincoln a war criminal for suspending the writ of habeas corpus and classifying political dissent as a hate crime against the State during the Civil War. I wonder if Jane would consider the hostilities between the North and South “genocide,” since in many cases it was brother against brother.  Lincoln claimed the War Between the States was necessary to save the Union.  By Jane’s definition of genocide, does that not make Lincoln a war criminal for advocating violence to squash political dissent? If so, should a war criminal have his face on Mount Rushmore? What about Lincoln’s secret plan to send all the African-Americans back to Africa after the Civil War, as part of his “reparations” deal? Was that not a crime against humanity?

Warren Buffet recently warned that our current debt is not sustainable, and threatens to turn us into a banana republic. That’s an interesting choice of words given we have our first African-American President. Some in the current administration might consider Mr. Buffet’s use of the term “banana republic” a “hate crime” given the history of race relations in this country, and the perception that many banana republics are governed by vicious despots who use military force not for defense of the republic, but to eliminate their political rivals and squash civil unrest.   That could never happen here, right? 
 
Does anyone remember Kent State? Remember Crosby Stills Nash & Young’s song, “Four Dead in Ohio?” Recording such a song today might get the artists thrown in jail and charged with a “hate crime” for thinking bad thoughts about an out of control Federal government. 
 
 
Civil wars happen for a reason. Spain’s civil war was a classic “culture war” between the Marxists on the left, supported by Russia, and the fascists on the right, under the command of General Francisco Franco, supported unofficially by the United States.  Ernest Hemingway’s “For Whom the Bell Tolls” depicted the brutality that took place in many of the towns and villages during the hostilities. Many could be clearly classified as genocide, and crimes against humanity. The novel’s protagonist Robert Jordan committed many vicious acts that one might consider “genocide” depending on whether or not if you classify blowing up trains full of women and children in the name of political ideology an act of war, or an act of terrorism.
 
As the so called “progressives” in this country likes to proclaim whenever there is a Republican in the White House, one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. It all depends on who’s ox is getting gored. 

References:

Genocide:  – noun -- the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group. Origin: 1940–45; < Gk géno(s) race + -cide.  Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved August 20, 2009, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/genocide

10 Things You Didn't Know About Abraham Lincoln

“But it was a wise man who said, ‘All I want to know is where I’m going to die so I’ll never go there.’ We don’t want our country to evolve into the banana-republic economy described by Keynes.”  -- Warren Buffet, chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway, a diversified holding company, in an article that appeared in print on August 19, 2009, on page A27 of the New York Times.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »