About Me

Name: Max Frost
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Song of the Resistance: Tribute to "The White Mouse"


Nancy Wake (8/30/1912 - 8/8/2011) was a real life character right out of the movie, “Inglourious Basterds,” (the 2009 Quentin Tarantino film starring Brad Pitt). 

She said, "In my opinion, the only good German was a dead German, and the deader, the better. I killed a lot of Germans, and I am only sorry I didn't kill more." 

In her interview with 60 Minutes Australia Nancy tells how she used to laugh at the body parts after blowing up Nazis and how she ate breakfast while watching a firing squad execute a female German spy. Her final statement is classic as she tells politicians to just bugger off if they don’t like what she has to say.

Watch the interview here:

http://video.au.msn.com/watch/video/classic-the-white-mouse/x8tob37?cpkey=93292a92-f000-4f28-a2c1-e93f7af9c45b%7C%7C%7C%7C

Just imagine if Sarah Palin or Michele Bachman had this kind of backbone or were this cunning when dealing with their political enemies in the current administration! 

This from the UK Guardian:

 By Kim Willsher, in Paris and published in the guardian.co.uk, Monday 8 August 2011

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/08/nancy-wake-white-mouse-gestapo

She was known as the White Mouse for her uncanny ability to run rings around the Gestapo in occupied France, in spite of a 5m franc price on her head.

But the nickname the Nazis gave Nancy Wake – one of Churchill's most highly decorated special agents, who has died aged 98 – belied her fearlessness and bravery.

With her coiffured hair and red lipstick, Wake was the epitome of glamour, but when she was dropped into occupied France she became a fighting force.

Even without a weapon, she could be deadly. During one raid she reportedly killed an SS guard with her bare hands to prevent him raising the alarm. "She is the most feminine woman I know until the fighting starts. Then she is like five men," one of her French colleagues recalled.

As a leading figure of the French resistance, credited with helping hundreds of allied soldiers escape after she was parachuted into France, Wake was among the allies' most decorated servicewomen.

The war ended in personal tragedy, however. On returning to her Marseille home after the liberation, she discovered her husband, French businessman Henri Fiocca, had been tortured and killed by the Gestapo for refusing to give her up.

Afterwards she would declare: "In my opinion, the only good German was a dead German, and the deader, the better. I killed a lot of Germans, and I am only sorry I didn't kill more." Little wonder she topped the Gestapo's most-wanted list.

Author Peter FitzSimons said after writing his book Nancy Wake: A Biography of Our Greatest War Heroine, published in 2001: "We both came to the conclusion that she was 10 times the man I would ever be." Her story inspired the 1999 novel by Sebastian Faulks, Charlotte Gray, later made into a film with Wake played by Australian actor Cate Blanchett.

Wake, born on 30 August 1912 in New Zealand, the youngest of six children, was raised in Australia, but was devastated when, at the age of four, her father abandoned the family – an event believed to have sparked her rebellious nature and fearsome temper.

At 16 she used a £200 inheritance from an aunt to travel to London, where she studied journalism before moving to Paris. In 1938 she married Fiocca, a wealthy French industrialist. They were living in Marseille when France fell.

Although wealthy enough to cocoon herself from the hardships of war, Wake chose to become a courier for the resistance. One day, warned that the Gestapo was on its way to arrest her, she kissed her husband for the last time and fled.

Wake made her way across the Pyrenees into Spain and returned to Britain where she joined the Special Operations Executive, a clandestine body formed by Churchill to train agents in guerrilla warfare against the Nazis and to bolster local resistance groups in occupied France.

On the night of 29 April 1944, Wake was parachuted into the Auvergne region where she co-ordinated a 7,000-strong resistance group and headed successful attacks on German forces in the area.

Wake believed the most useful of her wartime exploits was the time she cycled 500km over 71 hours, passing through several German checkpoints, to replace vital codes her wireless operator had been forced to destroy in a Gestapo raid. Without the codes there could be no fresh orders or drops of weapons and supplies.

"I got there and they said: 'How are you?' I cried. I couldn't stand up, I couldn't sit down. I couldn't do anything. I just cried," she said.

After the war, Britain awarded Wake the George medal, the United States gave her the Medal of Freedom and France honoured her with the Médaille de la Résistance, the Croix de Guerre – three times – and the Légion d'Honneur. In 1957, Wake married John Melvin Forward, a former RAF fighter pilot.

She returned several times to live in Australia, making unsuccessful attempts to get elected to parliament, but had an uneasy relationship with the country of her childhood, feeling unrecognised and underappreciated. This led her to refuse decorations from the Australian government; with characteristic bluntness, she said they could "stick their medals where the monkey stuck his nuts". In February 2004, she relented and was made a Companion of the Order of Australia.

Wake found post-war life uneventful. "It's all been so exciting … and then it all fizzled out. I had a very happy war," she said. FitzSimons told Australian radio: "She was a woman who was always a hair-trigger from being in a rage … and that rage within her was wonderful during the war, [but] it could be problematic when the war was over. She was a force of nature."

Her husband died in 1997 and Wake settled for a final time in London. She died on Sunday after being taken to hospital with a chest infection.

In an interview a decade ago, at the age of 89, Wake appeared to have lost none of her fighting spirit. "Somebody once asked me: 'Have you ever been afraid?' Hah! I've never been afraid in my life," she said. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


References: 

Inglourious Basterds is a 2009 war film written and directed by Quentin Tarantino and starring Brad Pitt, Christoph Waltz and Mélanie Laurent. The film tells the fictional story of two plots to assassinate the Nazi Germany political leadership, one planned by a young French Jewish cinema proprietor (Laurent), and the other by a team of Jewish Allied soldiers led by First Lieutenant Aldo Raine (Pitt).

Development on Inglourious Basterds began in 1998, when Tarantino wrote the script for the film. Tarantino struggled with the ending and chose to hold off filming and moved on to direct the two-part film Kill Bill. After directing Death Proof in 2007 (as part of the double feature Grindhouse), Tarantino returned to work on Inglourious Basterds. The film went into production in October 2008 and was filmed in Germany and France with a production budget of $70 million. Inglourious Basterds premiered on May 20, 2009 at the 62nd Cannes Film Festival, where it competed for the Palme d'Or. It was widely released in theaters in the United States and Europe in August 2009 by The Weinstein Company and Universal Studios.

The film was successful at the box office, grossing $320,351,773 in theaters worldwide, making it Tarantino's highest-grossing film to date. It received multiple awards and nominations, including eight Academy Award nominations. For his role as Hans Landa, Christoph Waltz won the Best Actor Award at the Cannes Film Festival, as well as the BAFTA Award, Golden Globe and the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.
 

Charlotte Gray is a 1999 book by Sebastian Faulks and completes his loose trilogy of books about France with an account of the adventures of a young Scotswoman who becomes involved with the French resistance during the Second World War. It is set in Vichy France during World War II. The story is thought to be based on the exploits of Nancy Wake, codenamed the white mouse, a member of the resistance in war time France and Pearl Cornioley, a British secret service agent.

Film, TV or theatrical adaptations

A film based on the book was produced in 2001. It stars Cate Blanchett and is directed by Gillian Armstrong.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whispers of Wormwood - Rise of the Demonic Mob


In her book, "Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America," author 
Ann Coulter traces the history of the liberal mob to the French Revolution and Robespierre’s revolutionaries, who simply proclaimed that they were exercising the “general will” before slaughtering their fellow citizens “for the good of mankind.” Similarly, as Coulter demonstrates, liberal mobs, from student radicals to white-trash racists to anti-war and pro-ObamaCare fanatics today, have consistently used violence to implement their idea of the “general will.” This is not the American tradition; it is the tradition of Stalin, of Hitler, of the guillotine—and the tradition of the American Left."  
 
Here's her book's review from Amazon.com:
 
The demon is a mob, and the mob is demonic. The Democratic Party activates mobs, depends on mobs, coddles mobs, publicizes and celebrates mobs—it is the mob. Sweeping in its scope and relentless in its argument, Demonic explains the peculiarities of liberals as standard groupthink behavior. To understand mobs is to understand liberals.
 
In her most provocative book to date, Ann Coulter argues that liberals exhibit all the psychological characteristics of a mob, for instance:
 
Liberal Groupthink: “The same mob mentality that leads otherwise law-abiding people to hurl rocks at cops also leads otherwise intelligent people to refuse to believe anything they haven’t heard on NPR.”

Liberal Schemes: “No matter how mad the plan is—Fraternité, the ‘New Soviet Man,’ the Master Race, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, Building a New Society, ObamaCare—a mob will believe it.”

Liberal Enemies: “Instead of ‘counterrevolutionaries,’ liberals’ opponents are called ‘haters,’ ‘those who seek to divide us,’ ‘tea baggers,’ and ‘right-wing hate groups.’ Meanwhile, conservatives call liberals ‘liberals’—and that makes them testy.”

Liberal Justice: “In the world of the liberal, as in the world of Robespierre, there are no crimes, only criminals.”

Liberal Violence: “If Charles Manson’s followers hadn’t killed Roman Polanski’s wife, Sharon Tate, Clinton would have pardoned him, too, and he’d probably be teaching at Northwestern University.”
 
Citing the father of mob psychology, Gustave Le Bon, Coulter catalogs the Left’s mob behaviors: the creation of messiahs, the fear of scientific innovation, the mythmaking, the preference for images over words, the lack of morals, and the casual embrace of contradictory ideas.
 
In a great article entitled, "The Mob Tears at the Foundations of Civilization in London and America," J. Christian Adams makes the some excellent points regarding the mob's demonic aspects:
 
To some, the Mob is a symptom of disenfranchisement, urban malaise or institutional hurt feelings. The Mob, after all, only awoke after a questionable police shooting in London. Excuses all, of course. Nothing justifies this behavior in nations built on the rule of law. Excuses are paralyzing those with the responsibility of enforcing the law, both in England and the United States.
Let’s return to the question of why. Many have absolute confidence about what we are witnessing. They can surely imagine the whispers of Wormwood to a thousand Patients. Delighted that the Mob has bypassed the gradual path toward evil, they can imagine him basking in the heat of burning double deckers in Peckham. They know who delights in a father’s dream for his daughter destroyed. Others perhaps imagine Legion, who admits in the Gospel of Mark, “We are many,” before being cast into the maniacal herd of pigs by Christ.   No longer simply pigs, the maniacal herd for our times now roams London and stalks families in Milwaukee and Akron. 
Whatever has fractured, whatever has failed, we need to discover and right it. Law, informed by a reverence for human dignity, has lifted our nation, our civilization, out of the darkness of history. The mayhem and violence we are witnessing provides a glimpse of an uncivilized age beyond our memory, before law ruled. 
 
Perhaps the civilized will outnumber the uncivilized. Or, perhaps the burning and looting provides instead a preview of our future.   

Here are some good examples of the "Whispers of Wormwood:"  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Wormwood in the Bible

Although the word wormwood appears several times in the Old Testament, translated from the Hebrew term ???? (la'anah), e.g., Deuteronomy 29:18 and Jeremiah 9:15, its only clear reference as a named entity occurs in the New Testament, in the Book of Revelation: "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon a third of the rivers, and upon the springs of water; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and a third of the waters became Bitter; and many people had died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

Interpretations of Revelation 8:10

Certain commentators have held that this "great star" represents one of several important figures in political or ecclesiastical history,[2] while other Bible dictionaries and commentaries view the term as a reference to a celestial being. A Dictionary of The Holy Bible states, "the star called Wormwood seems to denote a mighty prince, or power of the air, the instrument, in its fall, of sore judgments on large numbers of the wicked."[3] 
 

References

  1. ^ Lewis, James R., Oliver, Evelyn Dorothy (1996), Angels A to Z, Entry: Wormwood, p. 417, Visible Ink Press
  2. ^ Henry, Matthew, Commentary on the Whole Bible Volume VI (Acts to Revelation): Revelation Chap. VIII, Public domain, Library of Congress call no: BS490.H4, at Christian Classics Ethereal Library
  3. ^ Rand, W. W. (1859), A Dictionary of the Holy Bible: for general use in the study of the scriptures; with engravings, maps, and tables, Entry: WORM WOOD at archive.org
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Breaking the System: Obama's Strategy for Change

Received this from my good friend David Horowitz, a former Marxist/Communist and now President and Founder of  the "Freedom Center:"  
 
Dear [fill in the blank]:  

As our economy stands on the brink, with the national debt crisis raising the possibility that our grandchildren will inherit a bankrupt country that looks more like Greece than America, you have to wonder. What is Barack Obama thinking?

How can the President have let things come to this pass? Did he know that the trillions spent on a national health care disaster and a government takeover of key industries would make things so much worse? Why, in the face of disastrous unemployment, inflation and the prospect of default, does he stick to the same old leftwing playbook of higher taxes and class warfare? Is the President trying to strain the American economy to the breaking point?

If you think this last question is improbable it is only because you haven't read the plan of two Marxist Professors from the 1960's who hatched the plan to "stress the system" so that a leftwing government can take more control over our lives and make America a place we will no longer recognize as home. These two professors, Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward (whose work Obama learned about as a young "community organizer in Chicago) envisioned an activism that would flood the housing market with bad loans, overwhelm the electoral system with the names of dead and fictitious voters, and give a toxic shock to the health care industry by adding millions of people to the rolls with their bills to be paid for by the taxpayer. They wanted all this to happen so that America would be forced to embrace socialist solutions.

Does this strategy sound familiar? Early in the Obama administration, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel let the cat out of the bag when he said that "we shouldn't let a good crisis go to waste." The more profound the crisis, the more necessary to "radically transform America," as the President promised he would do on election eve 2008.

Piven and Cloward may not be household names, but their plan is playing a role in the financial chaos overtaking America today. That is why the Freedom Center must get the groundbreaking new pamphlet Breaking the System: Obama's Strategy for Change into the hands of as many Americans as possible at this critical moment when our country's economic future is being decided.

Breaking the System shows that Barack Obama is not merely the innocent prisoner of economic problems he inherited on taking office, as he has claimed. Rather he has deliberately shaped the government's response to give him an opportunity to move the country down the road to socialism. For the Obama Administration, crisis is not the tragedy, as it is for us; it is an opportunity to make left wing dreams come true. Breaking the System connects the dots by showing the connection between a radical plan of the 1960s and the President's current economic strategy.
 
Breaking the System is an indispensable guide for understanding our current economic predicament. That's why I'm asking for your help to get it into the public dialogue right now; into the blogosphere, the online media, the columnists, talk radio hosts, political editors, public officials, and every member of Congress! 

America stands on the economic brink. We must act immediately to keep the U.S. from becoming a third world country weighed down permanently by socialist solutions that grow government and crush individual initiative and personal freedom. I hope you will join me in this vital campaign. Please give generously to our effort to wake America up before it is too late.

Sincerely,

David Horowitz
President & Founder

P.S. No one in America understands the Left and the threat they pose to the future of our country more than me and my colleagues at the Freedom Center. Please help us today in fulfilling our mission in waking up and educating our fellow citizens.
 
Happy to help spread the word, David. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gangsta In-Da White House, by David Freddoso

On the positive side, if Donald Trump or Sarah Palin win the next election, they can use the precedents set by President Barack Obama to reward their friends and punish their enemies.  That shoud give the Democrats pause for thought, especailly if Donald Trump succeeds in finding out the secret behind President Obama's birth certificate. There's a military base in mothball status in Northern Nevada  that would make a great re-education center, LOL!

I think the big secret is President Obama, who was known as Barry Soetoro during his years at the Madrasah in Indonesia, shows his religion as Muslim or Islamic.  But, that's just me. 
 
 
 
 

Barack Obama: Gangster in the White House

"A bestseller!"—Sean Hannity

"Gangster Government is all the rage!"—Neil Cavuto

Bribery….coercion….intimidation. Sounds like a movie review of The Godfather, but unfortunately we're talking about our federal government.

So says bestselling author David Freddoso in his controversial new book, Gangster Government: Barack Obama and the New Washington Thugocracy.

In his 2008 New York Times bestseller, The Case Against Barack Obama, Freddoso examined Obama's pre-presidency actions and ideologies, revealing an extremely liberal Senator with shady alliances who would stop at nothing to become president of the United States.

Picking up where The Case Against Barack Obama left off, Gangster Government not only reveals the damage Obama has done since he has been in office, but exposes a side of Obama few have seen before—the corrupt Chicago politician whose number one goal behind any bill, stimulus, or regulation is to reward his friends and punish his enemies.

As Freddoso reveals, whether those "enemies" are oil companies, small businesses, or ordinary taxpayers like us, Obama will do—and has done—whatever it takes to sideline those who oppose him.

"Americans are used to politicians who help their friends when they can," says Freddoso. "But no one expected President Obama to reshape the presidency to the extent he has. So far, he has overturned hundreds of years of lawmaking in America, betrayed our Constitution, and mocked millions of voters."

A devastating and shocking look at a president whose training on Chicago's political playground shines though every bent law and every broken promise, Gangster Government documents the first two years of an administration that is so corrupt, it would make Al Capone blush.

Get your copy today by clicking below
to save 30% or more off bookstore prices!

Follow Regnery on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook!

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Michael Moore as "Brother Number One!"

 
As I watched this interview, I couldn’t help thinking of Anthony Bourdain’s recent trip to Cambodia for his Travel Channel show, “No Reservations Required.” He interviewed a very brave lady who led the opposition party to the Khmer Rouge at great risk to not only her own personal safety, but to her family’s as well. If it weren’t for people like her willing to fight this kind of evil at every turn, the world would indeed be a living hell for all of us. 
 
 
 

The Khmer Rouge took Phnom Penh on April 17, 1975. As the leader of the Communist Party, Saloth Sar was the designated leader of the new regime. He took the name "brother number one" and declared his nom de guerre Pol Pot. This has generally supposed to have been derived from Politique potentielle, the French equivalent of a phrase supposedly coined for him by the Chinese leadership. An alternative version of the origin of Pol Pot's name is from Philip Short, who states that Saloth Sar announced that he was adopting the name in July 1970 and suspects that it is derived from pol: “the Pols were royal slaves, an aboriginal people”, and that “Pot” was simply a “euphonic monosyllable” that he liked.[13]

A new constitution was adopted on January 5, 1976, officially altering the country's name to "Democratic Kampuchea". The newly established Representative Assembly held its first plenary meeting on April 11-13, electing a new government with Pol Pot as prime minister. His predecessor, Khieu Samphan was instead given the position of head of state as President of the State Presidium. Prince Sihanouk was given no role in the government and was placed under detention.

Immediately after the fall of Phnom Penh, the Khmer Rouge began to implement their concept of Year Zero and ordered the complete evacuation of Phnom Penh and all other recently captured major towns and cities. Those leaving were told that the evacuation was due to the threat of severe American bombing and it would last for no more than a few days.

Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge had been evacuating captured urban areas for many years, but the evacuation of Phnom Penh was unique in scale. The first operations to evacuate urban areas occurred in 1968 in the Ratanakiri area and were aimed at moving people deeper into Khmer Rouge territory to better control them. From 1971-1973, the motivation changed. Pol Pot and the other senior leaders were frustrated that urban Cambodians were retaining old habits of trade and business. When all other methods had failed, evacuation to the countryside was adopted to solve the problem.

In 1976, people were reclassified as full-rights (base) people, candidates and depositees - so called because they included most of the new people who had been deposited from the cities into the communes. Depositees were marked for destruction. Their rations were reduced to two bowls of rice soup, or "p'baw" per day. This led to widespread starvation. "New people" were allegedly given no place in the elections taking place on March 20, 1976, despite the fact the constitution was said to have established universal suffrage for all Cambodians over age 18.

The Khmer Rouge leadership boasted over the state-controlled radio that only one or two million people were needed to build the new agrarian communist utopia. As for the others, as their proverb put it, "To keep you is no benefit, to destroy you is no loss."[14]

Hundreds of thousands of the new people, and later the depositees, were taken out in shackles to dig their own mass graves. Then the Khmer Rouge soldiers beat them to death with iron bars and hoes or buried them alive. A Khmer Rouge extermination prison directive ordered, "Bullets are not to be wasted." These mass graves are often referred to as The Killing Fields.

The Khmer Rouge also classified by religion and ethnic group. They banned all religion and dispersed minority groups, forbidding them to speak their languages or to practice their customs. They especially targeted Buddhist monks, Muslims, Christians, Western-educated intellectuals, educated people in general, people who had contact with Western countries or with Vietnam, disabled people, and the ethnic Chinese, Laotians and Vietnamese. Some were put in the S-21 camp for interrogation involving torture in cases where a confession was useful to the government. Many others were summarily executed. Confessions forced at S-21 were extracted from prisoners through such methods as raising prisoners by their arms tied behind and dislocating shoulders, removing toenails with pliers, suffocating a prisoner repeatedly, and skinning a person while alive.[15]

According to François Ponchaud's book Cambodia: Year Zero, "Ever since 1972 the guerrilla fighters had been sending all the inhabitants of the villages and towns they occupied into the forest to live and often burning their homes, so that they would have nothing to come back to." The Khmer Rouge refused offers of humanitarian aid, a decision which proved to be a humanitarian catastrophe: millions died of starvation and brutal government-inflicted overwork in the countryside. To the Khmer Rouge, outside aid went against their principle of national self-reliance.

Property became collective, and education was dispensed at communal schools. Children were raised on a communal basis. Even meals were prepared and eaten communally. Pol Pot's regime was extremely paranoid. Political dissent and opposition were not permitted. People were treated as opponents based on their appearance or background. Torture was widespread. In some instances, throats were slit as prisoners were tied to metal bed frames.

Thousands of politicians and bureaucrats accused of association with previous governments were executed. Phnom Penh was turned into a ghost city, while people in the countryside were dying of starvation or illnesses or simply killed.

  • 11 Thet Sambath (October 20, 2001). "Sister No. 1 The Story of Khieu Ponnary, Revolutionary and First Wife of Pol Pot". The Cambodia Daily, WEEKEND. http://www.camnet.com.kh/cambodia.daily/selected_features/khiev.htm. Retrieved 2007-11-15.
  • 12 See Pol Pot: Anatomy of a Nightmare, p. 212.
  • 13 Children of Cambodia's Killing Fields, Worms from Our Skin. Teeda Butt Mam. Memoirs compiled by Dith Pran. 1997, Yale University. ISBN 978-0-300-07873-2. Excerpts available from Google Books.
  • 14 "Moreorless.com : Heroes & Killers of the 20th century - Pol Pot". http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/pot.html. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
  • 15 Washington Post, June 4, 23, 1975.   
     

    As Aerosmith so brilliantly sang back in the early 70’s, Michael Moore’s rhetoric is nothing more than “the same old song, the same old song, the same old song and dance, my friends.” 

     
     
     
     
  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Did Wall Street Rip Off Washington?

     
    Interesting interview from Russia Today about the yearlong investigation into the financial crisis and how US President Obama's bipartisan "meltdown panel" produced a 600-page book that analysts say amounts to nothing other than casting a wide net of blame, while letting the underlying problems remain unsolved.
     
     
    Despite more than a year of investigation into the financial crisis, US President Obama's bipartisan "meltdown panel" cast a wide net of blame. All-in they produced a more than 600-page book that may amount to nothing, according to analysts. Gerald Celente, the director of the Trends Research Institute in New York said the report is not new, it's all information that was public knowledge and many analysts warned of for years. For more, watch our sister channel RT America on http://www.youtube.com/RTAmerica

    Category:  News & Politics

     

    After reading "The Quants," I couldn't help but wonder if these so called math whizzes were behind the meltdown, as well as the flashcrash of May 6th, 2010, which to this day has not been satisfactorily explained to the American people.

     

    A small group of brainy math whizzes are emerging as the unlikely group who nearly brought down the finance industry. As WSJ's Scott Patterson reports, a group called "The Quants" developed complex systems to trade securities such as mortgage derivatives, which were at the heart of the crisis.


     
    Then I see this story in the Wall Street Journal online, and it only confirms my suspicions:
     
  • JANUARY 22, 2010
  • The Minds Behind the Meltdown

    How a swashbuckling breed of mathematicians and computer scientists nearly destroyed Wall Street

    By SCOTT PATTERSON

    On Thursday, President Barack Obama proposed new rules to curb a number of Wall Street's risky—and highly profitable—trading activities. One target: The secretive trading operations within banks that use large doses of leverage, or borrowed money, to make huge bets on the market. Wall Street says the regulations are unnecessary, and since the financial crisis struck, most banks have cut back on these trading outfits. But when the downturn first hit in the summer of 2007, several of them were among the first to suffer, and collectively they lost billions over a matter of days.

     
    Then, just to add a little insult to injury, comes this gem today from the Wall Street Journal online:
     
  • JANUARY 28, 2011
  • Trader Racks Up a Second Epic Gain

    $5 Billion Profit for John Paulson

    By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN

    Hedge-fund manager John Paulson personally netted more than $5 billion in profits in 2010—likely the largest one-year haul in investing history, trumping the nearly $4 billion he made with his "short" bets against subprime mortgages in 2007.

     
    It’s good to see crony capitalism is still very much alive and well. 
     
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Equal Protection Clause and ObamaCare Waivers

    Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
     
     
     
    Would someone with a law degree please explain how granting waivers to the Obamacare law is not a federal violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?  

    Equal Protection Clause

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The Equal Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, provides that "no state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".[1] The Equal Protection Clause can be seen as an attempt to secure the promise of the United States' professed commitment to the proposition that "all men are created equal"[2] by empowering the judiciary to enforce that principle against the states. As written it applied only to state governments, but it has since been interpreted to apply to the Federal Government of the United States as well.

    More concretely, the Equal Protection Clause, along with the rest of the Fourteenth Amendment, marked a great shift in American constitutionalism. Before the enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights protected individual rights only from invasion by the federal government. After the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, the Constitution also protected rights from abridgment by state leaders and governments, even including some rights that arguably were not protected from abridgment by the federal government. In the wake of the Fourteenth Amendment, the states could not, among other things, deprive people of the equal protection of the laws. What exactly such a requirement means has been the subject of much debate, and the story of the Equal Protection Clause is the gradual explication of its meaning.
     

    Carolene Products and the various levels of Equal Protection scrutiny

    Despite the undoubted importance of Brown, much of modern equal protection jurisprudence stems from footnote four of United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938), a Commerce Clause and substantive due process case. In 1937, the Court (in what was called the "switch in time that saved nine") had loosened its rules for deciding whether Congress could regulate certain commercial activities. In discussing the new presumption of constitutionality that the Court would apply to economic legislation, Justice Harlan Stone wrote:
    [P]rejudice against discrete and insular minorities may be a special condition, which tends seriously to curtail the operation of those political processes ordinarily to be relied upon to protect minorities, and which may call for a correspondingly more searching judicial inquiry.[4]

    Thus were born the "more searching" levels of scrutiny—"strict" and "intermediate"—with which the Court would examine legislation directed at racial minorities and women respectively. Although the Court first articulated a "strict scrutiny" standard for laws based on race-based distinctions in Hirabayashi v. United States (1943) and Korematsu v. United States (1944), the Court did not apply strict scrutiny, by that name, until the 1967 case of Loving v. Virginia. Intermediate scrutiny did not command the approbation of a majority of the Court until the 1976 case of Craig v. Boren.

    The Supreme Court has defined these levels of scrutiny in the following way:

    • Strict scrutiny (if the law categorizes on the basis of race or national origin or infringes a fundamental right): the law is unconstitutional unless it is "narrowly tailored" to serve a "compelling" government interest. In addition, there cannot be a "less restrictive" alternative available to achieve that compelling interest.
    • Intermediate scrutiny (if the law categorizes on the basis of sex): the law is unconstitutional unless it is "substantially related" to an "important" government interest.[5]
    • Rational-basis test (if the law categorizes on some other basis): the law is constitutional so long as it is "reasonably related" to a "legitimate" government interest.

    Although in 1985 the court in City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. held mentally retarded persons were deemed to be subject to a "rational basis" test, in invalidating seemingly rational zoning laws and land use restrictions, many assert that the court introduced an "enhanced" rational basis test that required the state to show more than a facially valid law and instead to balance the community's needs against the needs of the disabled.[6]

    There is, arguably, a fourth level of scrutiny for equal protection cases. In United States v. Virginia Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the Court, eschewed the traditional language of intermediate scrutiny for sex-based discrimination and instead borrowed from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's opinion for the Court in Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan in demanding that litigants articulate an "exceedingly persuasive" argument to justify this kind of discrimination. Whether this was simply a restatement of the doctrine of intermediate scrutiny or whether it created a new level of scrutiny between the intermediate and strict standards is unclear.

    References

    1. ^ U.S. Constitution, Amendment 14
    2. ^ U.S. Declaration of Independence
    3. ^ For details on the rationale for, and ratification of, the Fourteenth Amendment, see generally Foner, Eric (1988). Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863—1877. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 006091453X., as well as Brest, Paul; et al. (2000). Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking. Gaithersburg: Aspen Law & Business. pp. 241–242. ISBN 0735512507.
    4. ^ 304 U.S. 144, 152 n.4 (1938). For a theory of judicial review based on Stone's footnote, see Ely, John Hart (1981). Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674196376.
    5. ^ Craig v. Boren (No. 75-628)
    6. ^ "Disability Rights - ACLU Position/Briefing Paper". American Civil Liberties Union. 1999-01-01. http://www.aclu.org/disability/gen/10648pub19990101.html.
    7. ^ Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is applied to private employers such as Griggs Power through Congress's Commerce Clause power, not through the Fourteenth Amendment. (This is, of course, consistent with the state action doctrine articulated in the Civil Rights Cases.) However, Title VII also applies to public employers, and the Supreme Court has consistently applied the same disparate impact doctrine to both private and public employers. Compare Griggs with Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977), a Title VII suit against the Alabama prison system.
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    From Weathermen to Limbaugh

     

    Civility? What civility? From dueling pistols at dawn to Rush Limbaugh at noon EST, America'a history is rich with civility. In fact, nothing says civility like bombing the Pentagon, then 40 years later telling the mainstream news media (MSM) you wish you had done more (William Ayers), then helping the President get elected so he can carry on your progressive agenda. 

    Anyone with a computer and knowledge on how to use Google could have found this on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The left wing liberals, or progressives or whatever label they prefer these days, have a rich history of civility, as Rush Limbaugh highlighted on his radio show recently.   

    Here are some great examples:

    Weatherman, also known as Weathermen and later Weather Underground Organization, was an American militant organization that carried out a series of bombings, jailbreaks, and riots from 1969 through the 1970s.

    Following is a list of the organization's various activities and incidents.

    1969

    • June 18-22 – Students for a Democratic Society SDS National Convention held in Chicago, Illinois. Publication of "Weatherman" founding statement. Members seize control of SDS National Office.[1][2]
    • September 3 – Female members participate in a "jailbreak" at South Hills High School in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where they run through the school shouting anti-war slogans and distributing literature promoting the “National Action.” The term "Pittsburgh 26" refers to the 26 women arrested in connection with this incident.[2]
    • September 24 – A group of members confront Chicago Police during a demonstration supporting the "National Action," and protesting the commencement of the Chicago Eight trial stemming from the 1968 Democratic National Convention.[6]
    • October 5 – The Haymarket Police Statue in Chicago is bombed; Weathermen later claim credit for the bombing in their book, Prairie Fire.[6]
    • October 8-11 – The "Days of Rage" riots occur in Chicago, damaging a large amount of property. 287 Weatherman members are arrested, some become fugitives when they fail to appear for trial in connection with their arrests.[2][6]
    • November 8th - Sniper attack on Cambridge Police Station. Two shots were fired. Two Weathermen, James Kilpatrick and James Reaves, were indicted and then subsequently released when a witness recanted his testimony.[7]
    • December 6 – Bombing of several Chicago police cars parked in a precinct parking lot at 3600 North Halsted Street, Chicago. The WUO claims responsibility in Prairie Fire, stating it is a protest of the fatal police shooting of Illinois Black Panther Party leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark on December 4, 1969.
    • December 27-30 – Weathermen hold a "War Council" in Flint, Michigan, where plans are finalized to change into an underground organization that will commit strategic acts of sabotage against the government. Thereafter they are called "Weather Underground Organization" (WUO).[2][8]

    1970

    • January - Silas and Judith Bissell placed a home-made bomb under the steps of the R.O.T.C. building. The bomb was made from an electric blasting cap, an alarm clock, a battery and a plastic bag filled with gasoline and explosives.[9]
    • February – The WUO closes the SDS National Office in Chicago, concluding the major campus-based organization of the 1960s. The first contingent of the VB returns from Cuba and the second contingent departs. By mid-February the bulk of the leading WUO members go underground.
    • On February 21, the house of Judge Murtagh, who presides over the Panther 21 trial, is fire-bombed by a WUO cell in New York City.[2][10] The same night, molotov cocktails were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn.[11]
    • March – Warrants are issued for several WUO members, who become federal fugitives when they fail to appear for trial in Chicago.
    • March 30 – Chicago police discover a WUO "bomb factory" on Chicago’s north side.
    • April 1 - Based on a tip Chicago Police find 59 sticks of dynamite, ammunition, and nitro glyerine in an apartment traced to WUO members.[12] The discover of the WUO weapons cache ends WUO activity in this city.
    • April 2 - A federal grand jury in Chicago returns a number of indictments charging WUO members with violation of federal anti-riot laws.[8] Also, a number of additional federal warrants charging "unlawful flight to avoid prosecution" are returned in Chicago based on the failure of WUO members to appear for trial in local cases. (The Anti-riot Law charges were later dropped in January, 1974.)
    • June 9 - The New York City Police headquarters is bombed by Jane Alpert and accomplices. Weathermen state this is in response to "police repression."[13][14] The bomb made with ten sticks of dynamite exploded in the NYC Police Headquarters. The explosion was preceded by a warning about six minutes prior to the detonation and subsequently by a WUO claim of responsibility.[15]
    • July 23 – A federal grand jury in Detroit, Michigan, returns indictments against thirteen WUO members and former WUO members charging violations of various explosives and firearms laws.[13][14] (These indictments were later dropped in October, 1973.)
    • October 10 - A Queens traffic-court building is bombed. WUO claims this is to express support for the New York prison riots. [NYT, 10/10/70, p. 12]
    • October 11 - A Courthouse in Long Island City, NY is bombed. An estimated 8 to 10 sticks of dynamite are used. A warning was given around 10 min. prior to the 1:23 AM blast by the WUO.[20]
    • October 12 - Around October 12 eight bomb explosions occur, Five in Rochester New York, Two in NYC, and One in Orlando FL. Despite WUO bomb warnings three persons are injured.[21]
    • December 5th - Five Weatherman are captured for trying to bomb First National City Bank of NY and other buildings on the anniversary of the death of Fred Hampton. These individuals subsequently plead guilty.[23]
    • December 11th - Vivian Bogart and Patricia Mclean from the WUO are arrested after throwing an incendiary bomb at the Royal National Bank in NYC around 1:30 AM.[24]
    • December 16 - Fugitive WUO member Judith Alice Clark is arrested on the Days of Rage indictments by the FBI in New York.[18]

    1971

    • April – FBI agents discover what is dubbed "Pine Street Bomb Factory", an abandoned apartment utilized by WUO in San Francisco, California.
    • October 15 - The bombing of William Bundy's office in the MIT research center. [NYT, 10/16/71]

    1972

    • May 19 - Bombing of The Pentagon, "in retaliation for the U.S. bombing raid in Hanoi." The date was chosen for it being Ho Chi Minh's birthday. [NYT, 5/19/72][27]

    1973

    • May 18 - The bombing of the 103rd Police Precinct in New York. WUO states this is in response to the killing of 10-year-old black youth Clifford Glover by police.[28][note 1]
    • September 19 – A WUO member is arrested by the FBI in New York. Released on bond, this member again submerges into the underground.
    • September 28 - The ITT headquarters in New York and Rome, Italy are bombed. WUO states this is in response to ITT's alleged role in the Chilean coup earlier that month. [NYT, 9/28/73]
    • Around October, 1973 the Government requested dropping charges against most of the WUO members. The requests cited a recent decision by the Supreme Court that barred electronic surveillance without a court order. This decision could hamper prosecution of the WUO cases. In addition, the government did not want to reveal foreign intelligence secrets that the court has ordered disclosed.[29]

    1974

    • June 17 - Gulf Oil's Pittsburgh headquarters is bombed. WUO states this is to protest the company's actions in Angola, Vietnam, and elsewhere.
    • July – The WUO releases the book Prairie Fire, in which they indicate the need for a unified Communist Party. They encourage the creation of study groups to discuss their ideology, and continue to stress the need for violent acts. The book also admits WUO responsibility of several actions from previous years. The Prairie Fire Organizing Committee (PFOC) arises from the teachings in this book and is organized by many former WUO members.

    1975

    • January 29 - Bombing of the State Department; WUO states this is in response to escalation in Vietnam. (AP. "State Department Rattled by Blast," The Daily Times-News, January 29, 1975, p. 1)[31]
    • January 23 - Offices of Dept. of Defense in Oakland are bombed. In a statement released to the press, Weather expressed solidarity with the Vietnamese still fighting against the Thieu regime in Vietnam. [32]
    • Spring - WUO publishes "Politics in Command," which is its new political-military strategy. It furthers the line of building a legal, above-ground organization and begins to minimize the armed struggle role.[31]
    • March – The WUO releases its first edition of a new magazine entitled Osawatomie.[33]
    • June 16 - Weathermen bomb a Banco de Ponce (a Puerto Rican bank) in New York, WUO states this is in solidarity with striking Puerto Rican cement workers.[31][33]
    • July 11-13 – The Prairie Fire Organizing Committee (PFOC) holds its first national convention during which time they go through the formality of creating a new organization.[33]
    • September – Bombing of the Kennecott Corporation; WUO states this is in retribution for Kennecott's alleged involvement in the Chilean coup two years prior.[33][34]

    1976

    • 1976-1981 the Weather Underground slowly disbands, many members turning themselves in after taking advantage of the Federal Government dropping most charges in 1973 (illegal wiretaps and intelligence sources & methods issues) and of President Jimmy Carter’s amnesty for draft dodgers.

    1977

    • February - The first issue of Prairie Fire Organizing Committee's magazine, Breakthrough, is published.[35]
    • Spring - The John Brown Book Club compiles articles critical of the old WUO leadership and subsequent split in a pamphlet entitled: The Split of the Weather Underground Organization: Struggling against White and Male Supremacy.[35]
    • November - Five WUO members are arrested on conspiracy to bomb California State Senator, John Brigg's offices. It is later revealed that the Revolutionary Committee and PFOC had been infiltrated, and the arrests were the results of the infiltration. From this point on, some authors argue that the Weather Underground Organization ceases to exist.[35]

    1980

    • July - Former WUO member, Cathy Wilkerson surfaces in New York City and is charged with possession of explosives arising from the 1970 townhouse explosion. She is sentenced to 3 years in prison.[36]
    • December 3 - Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers turn themselves in. Charges against Ayers are dropped in 1973 (illegal wire taps & foreign intelligence sources and methods). Dohrn is placed on probation. It was discovered that the FBI had discussed a plan to kidnap her nephew, amongst other controversial schemes.[37]

    1981

    • October 20 - Brinks robbery in which WUO members Kathy Boudin, Sam Brown, Judy Clark and David Gilbert and the Black Liberation Army stole over $1.6 million from a Brinks armored car at the Nanuet Mall, near Nyack, New York on October 20, 1981. The robbers were stopped by police later that day and engaged them in a shootout, killing two police officers and one Brinks guard[37] as well as wounding several others.

    1987

    Silas Bissell a leader of the Weather Underground Organization, who was once on the FBI's Ten Most is arrested for bombing a ROTC building. His ex-wife, Judith Bissell served three years for the attempted bombing of CA State Senator John Briggs[38]
     

    References

    1. ^ Caplan
    2. ^ a b c d e f g Gilbert 31
    3. ^ Wittman
    4. ^ FBI Surveillence Files 97, 107
    5. ^ FBI Surveillence Files 97
    6. ^ a b c Berger 325
    7. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 18–19. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    8. ^ a b c d Berger 326
    9. ^ WALLACE TURNER (January 22, 1987). "TIP LEADS TO THE ARREST OF RADICAL SOUGHT IN 1970 OREGON CASE". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/01/22/us/tip-leads-to-the-arrest-of-radical-sought-in-1970-oregon-case.html?pagewanted=1.
    10. ^ Murtagh, John M. Fire in the Night, City Journal, April 30, 2008
    11. ^ Perlmutter, Emanuel (February 22, 1970). "Justice Murtagh's Home Target of 3 Fire Bombs". The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F1061FF83F5C117688DDAB0A94DA405B808BF1D3.
    12. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 25–26. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    13. ^ a b c d e Berger 327
    14. ^ a b c d Gilbert 32
    15. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 31–32. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    16. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 32–33. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    17. ^ a b Berger 328
    18. ^ a b c d e f Gilbert 33
    19. ^ http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/467.html
    20. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. p. 34. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    21. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. p. 35. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    22. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 33, 36. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    23. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 36–37. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    24. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 36–37. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    25. ^ Berger 329
    26. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. p. 40. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    27. ^ a b Berger 330
    28. ^ Berger 331
    29. ^ The Weather Underground.. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1975. pp. 40, 47, 65-65, 111-112. http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/WeatherUndergrnd.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
    30. ^ Berger 332
    31. ^ a b c d Gilbert 37
    32. ^ Jacobs, Ron (1997). The Way The Wind Blew: A History Of The Weather Underground. Verso. p. 81. ISBN 1-85984-167-8. http://www.archive.org/stream/TheWayTheWindBlewAHistoryOfTheWeatherUnderground/waythewindblew_djvu.txt. Retrieved December 28, 2009.
    33. ^ a b c d Berger 333
    34. ^ Albert
    35. ^ a b c Gilbert 38
    36. ^ Gilbert 39
    37. ^ a b Berger 335
    38. ^ Wallace Turner (January 22, 1987). "TIP LEADS TO THE ARREST OF RADICAL SOUGHT IN 1970 OREGON CASE". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/01/22/us/tip-leads-to-the-arrest-of-radical-sought-in-1970-oregon-case.html?pagewanted=1. Retrieved December 30, 2009.

    Bibliography

    External links

     
     
     

    Thursday, January 13, 2011

    Rush's Thoughts on the Arizona Pep Rally  

    A "lack of civility," meaning conservatives, had nothing to do with this madman's massacre! (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

    "I was expecting a solemn memorial -- and to the president's credit, I actually think he was, too.  I guess the thing that really grated on me was everybody participating thought it was about them and not the victims or their families." -Rush

    No Civility for Sarah Palin. The Unbridled, Vitriolic

    Hatred Continues Unabated (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

    Civility is the New Censorship Aimed at Our Side

    It means, "You shut up!"  It means, "Stop criticizing us and do as you're told." (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

    "Say we conservatives still disagree but we do it quietly -- without passion, in hushed tones, with the words 'please' and 'thank you.' How are we supposed to react when the other side is uncivil to us?" -Rush

    Record Ratings for Haney Project! The Haney Project Site ||  Clips on Rush's Facebook Page

    » World Golf: Rush Limbaugh's Golf Channel Premiere Sets Milestone Rating for The Haney Project

    Great Democrat Memorials Past: Clinton Laugh/Cry Ron Brown Video, 1996 (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)
     
    Great Democrat Memorials Past: The Wellstone Memorial, 2002 (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

    CNN and Fox News All-Star Commentators Switch Roles on Obama Speech

    David "Rodham" Gergen said it didn't transform Obama's presidency like Clinton's speech and it was like a political rally. Paul "The Forehead" Begala said it was too long. Meanwhile, Krauthammer's gang praised it.

    Rush's Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page...
    » Civility to be Theme of State of the Union Show » Daniel Henninger, WSJ: Why the Left Lost It
    » Recovery? Jobless Claims Jump, Food Costs Surge » Tax Credit for Small-Business Hiring Barely Tapped  
    » Federal Budget Deficit Narrows to $80B in December » Solar Company That Got $58M Leaves Mass.
    » 2011 to Top 2010 Record of 1 Million Foreclosures » GM Stock Sale May Trim Taxpayer Recovery
    » Are You Carrying a Gun? Are You 1,000 Feet from a Member of Congress or Federal Official? Careful!

     

     
     
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    My Constitutional Fetish


    Like Rush Limbaugh, I too have a fetish for the Constitution and I wrote about it back in October 2009:

    http://melcward.blogtownhall.com/2009/10/17/our_unconstitutional_government.thtml

    I can now claim I had a Constitutional fetish before it was cool to come out of the closet and before the New York Times came up with such a ridiculous metaphor for those who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic

    Apparently, some people in our federal government took the oath to support and defend the Constitution with reservation of thought and complete contempt for the document’s principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  These people need to be exposed and forced out of public service.  If they didn’t sign up to serve the public and not themselves, they have no business in public life. 

    “Service before self” should be the motto for every single freshman legislator and they should remind all those who’ve made politics a career that it should be theirs also. 

    On the Death Panels, I hate to echo Rush Limbaugh and say “I told you so,” but I did. Great minds do indeed think alike.  

     
    Wednesday, January 5, 2010
     

    Liberals: Conservatives Have a "Fetish" for Constitution
    Democrats display contempt for our nation's founding.
     
    Dems Push Health Care Deficit Lie, Falsely Claim
    That Repealing It Will Cost the Government Money

    Who do they think they're kidding about this boondoggle?

    "I wonder how many people in the media and how many Democrats know that our nation's first official Thanksgiving was to give thanks for the new Constitution. Not the Indians and turkey and popcorn or  gravy.  It was to give thanks for the new Constitution -- and now it's a 'fetish' to revere it." -Rush

    See, Sarah Palin Told You So: Obama Death Panels are Back
    (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

    "Everybody knows these death panels were in Obamacare in the first place.  It's rationing!  It's the only way this can be done. Obama would rather spend money on people who are gonna vote for Democrats a lot longer than senior citizens are gonna vote for anybody because they're gonna die." -Rush

    Professor Cornel West is Depressed About "Milquetoast" Obama
    He says the first black president "surcame" to big business. (He's a professor. He knows what it means.)
     

     
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Harry Reid: The King of Crony Capitalism

    America is fast becoming a “Kleptocracy,” or a government by thieves and influential government employees exploiting their posts for personal gain (i.e. embezzlement, fraud, bribery, etc.), so it came as no surpise when Sen. Harry Reid claimed he made so much money while on what he called a “fixed income.” 

    Because of mass corporate manipulation and political corruption, this government is no longer accountable to the people. Our country's public sector corruption operates like a “banana republic,” and as such, most of our legislators are generally for sale, working mainly as ceremonial functionaries. 
     



    From Rush Limbaugh:  Who Are You, Harry Reid?

    Reid's thin resume, riches, and shady land deals.

    » AP Exclusive: Reid Got $1M in Land Sale

    » LVRJ: Reid Has Made $42 Million Since Being Elected

     
     
    U.S. Sen. Harry Reid's top donors
    1982-2009

    Top 10 Political Action Committee Donors
    1. AT&T Inc. $133,650
    2. Laborers' International $110,450
    3. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees $104,000
    4. American Bankers Association $102,896
    5. MGM Mirage $95,000
    6. Altria Group Inc. $93,900
    7. Harrah's Entertainment Inc. $93,500
    8. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees -- IBT $89,000
    9. International Association of Machinists $88,250
    10. American Association for Justice $82,000

    Top 5 individual donors
    1. David B. Krone $35,000 (former lobbyist and executive vice president for National Cable and Telecommunications Association; now works for Reid as a senior adviser)
    2. Rita M. Lewis $31,300 (senior vice president of government relations for National Cable and Telecommunications Association; former Democratic strategist and aide to former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D.)
    3. Phyllis Frias $31,000 (head of Frias Hold Co., largest taxicab operator in Nevada)
    4. William T. Walters $30,600 (Billy Walters is head of The Walters Group, real estate firm and golf course developer in Las Vegas.)
    5. Fatih Ozmen $27,000 (chief executive of Sierra Nevada Corp., defense contractor based in Sparks)

    Source: Center for Public Integrity
    http://www.lvrj.com/news/study--reid-has-collected--42-million-in-30-year-career-95825729.html
     
    “. . . a money class fleeces the banking system, while the very trunk of the national tree is permitted to rot and crash.”
     ~ Christopher Hitchens, "America, The Banana Republic." Vanity Fair. 9 Oct. 2008.
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    HR 5741: Is mandatory service equivalent to slavery?


    According to a news story on SpreadIt.Org (http://news.spreadit.org/hr-5741-universal-national-service-acth-r-5741-2-year-service/) “A ‘mandatory service’ bill, H.R. 5741, is currently being debated in the House of Representatives. Some have compared the notion to slavery, but many other countries currently require that their citizens serve some type of mandatory service in order to live within the nation’s borders. If the bill did pass, it could affect individuals who are between the ages of 18 and 42 for two years.” 

    SpreadIt.Org goes on to state, “The bill was introduced by Charles Rangel, who is currently under an ethics investigation, and the bill currently has no co-sponsor, suggesting that perhaps there is not very much support for the bill in the government. Similar bills have gone through the house before. Rahm Emanuel previously talked about a similar plan, but his plan only required three months of service for individuals between the ages of 18 and 25. While the bill has received increased coverage, it is very unlikely that it will ever be passed in its current form.” 

    While the bill would require people serve two years of mandatory service to the government, it’s unclear what things each person would be required to do, but most think the jobs would relate to national defense and homeland security.  Some argue the act violates the constitution and the foundation upon which the country was built. 

    Some think the chances of the bill passing are slim and it only makes for an interesting debate.  The problem with that line of thinking is it disregards what a lame duck congress might do if Republicans win big in November. H.R. 5741 would undoubtedly be fast tracked by Democrats before they leave office so President Obama would get his wish for a civil defense force under his command. 

    According to Now The End Begins (http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/pages/obama/universal-national-service-act-hr-5741.htm), the first part of the plan was enacted in a little known section of the ObamaCare bill.

    Here’s a portion of what Now the End Begins recently published on their website:

    On March 23rd, 2010, the 77th anniversary of Adolf Hitler's Enabling Act bill, Obama signed into law H.R. 3590 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as ObamaCare. It's a big bill to say the least. The copy that I read at frwebgate.access.gpo.gov is filled with legal mumbo-jumbo right up until you get to section 5210. In that section there is hidden a little gem called "ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS".
     
    Here is how Section 5210 from the ObamaCare bill starts:

    H. R. 3590-496 (Page 496) SEC. 5210. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.

    Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows: "SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS. "(a) ESTABLISHMENT.-

    "(1) IN GENERAL.-There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency.

    "(2) REQUIREMENT.-All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended.

    "(3) APPOINTMENT.-Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.

    "(4) ACTIVE DUTY.-Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training.  
     
    Judge Napolitano explains Obama's Army from a legal perspective, on the Fox Business Network.
     
    "Now the End Begins" concludes with this warning:

    “To boil it all down, President Obama with the stroke of his pen, signed into law a bill that gives him the power to create a standing army of soldiers to carry out his direct orders without consulting anyone. He is going to staff his private army with the people forced into mandatory national service.”

    The FEMA Camp conspiracy theorists have been laughed at for years by members of the main stream media. These types of videos have been circulating YouTube for years:  

     
    AMC TV is tapping into this “collective paranoia” with their new fall conspiracy series, Rubicon.  The tag line, “Not every conspiracy is a theory,” might be closer to the truth than many in the mainstream media would care to acknowledge or realize. They’d prefer to keep their collectivist minds buried deep in the proverbial sands of ignorance and bliss.  
     
     
     
    As they used to say on the popular TV series The X Files, "The truth is out there." 
     
     
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Are "Useful Idiots" a National Security Threat?


    This amazing interview was done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to. It's shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps.
     
     
     
    After watching the video, I was reminded of the The Spanish Civil War, a major conflict that devastated Spain from 17 July 1936 to 1 April 1939, and was dubbed as "the first media war," with several writers and journalists covering it wanting their work "to support the cause."  Foreign correspondents and writers covering it included Ernest Hemingway, Martha Gellhorn, George Orwell and Robert Capa.
     
    Republicans (republicanos) were supported by the Soviet Union and Mexico, while the followers of the rebellion, Nationalists (nacionales), received the support of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, as well as neighbouring Portugal. The war increased international tensions in Europe, and in the end, lead-up to World War II.  It was largely seen as a proxy war between the Communist Soviet Union and Fascist states Italy and Germany
     
    The war often pitted family members, neighbors, and friends against each other. Apart from the combatants, many civilians were killed for their political or religious views by both sides. After the war ended in 1939, an estimated total of 300,000+ people had lost their lives. Out of them probably 120,000+ were civilians executed by either side.
     
    Hemingway chronicled many of the atrocities committed during the war in his book, "For Whom the Bell Tolls." 
     
    This video illustrates just how easy it is for foreign operatives to influence the fate of a nation by using the nation’s own intelligentsia against their countrymen to foster dissent and create political unrest. This battle has been going on since the end of WWII and the beginning of the Cold War.  
     
    I fear many of our own “well intentioned” intellectuals have fallen prey to foreign intelligence operatives that are brighter and more sophisticated than we give them credit.
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Radical Islam's Fifth Column in America

     

    Some attribute the term “fifth column” with a remark General Francisco Franco made as he was marching on Madrid with four columns of troops, and a “fifth column” of sympathizers within the city ready to help. In actuality, the term originated in a 1936 radio address by General Emilio Mola, an insurgent during the 1936–39 Spanish Civil War.  He broadcast a message that the four columns of his forces outside the city of Madrid would be supported by a "fifth column" of his supporters inside the city.  

    The term has become widely associated with people willing to cooperate with an aggressor against their own country. During the early stages of the World War II it was used in Britain as justification for the mass internment of German nationals residing within the United Kingdom to the Isle of Man.  Around the same time, using the same justification, the United States government interned Japanese citizens.  

    On February 19, 1942, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt authorized the internment of people of Japanese ancestry by signing Executive Order 9066. The order authorized local military commanders to designate "military areas" as "exclusion zones," from which "any or all persons may be excluded."  This power was used to declare that all people of Japanese ancestry were excluded from the entire Pacific coast, including all of California and most of Oregon and Washington.  The Supreme Court even went as far as to uphold the constitutionality of the exclusion orders in 1944, while noting that the provisions that singled out people of Japanese ancestry were a separate issue outside the scope of the proceedings. 

    In an featured editorial in Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) entitled, “Jihad's 5th Column” (11/06/2009), the paper notes the following:

    “In the wake of the worst domestic military-base massacre in U.S. history, this is an outrage to say the least. And the PC blinders explain how Fort Hood commanders could have failed so horrifically in protecting their force from the internal threat there.”

    “Instead, brass are actively recruiting Muslim soldiers — whose ranks have swelled to more than 15,000 — and catering to their faith by erecting mosques even at Marine headquarters in Quantico, Va. More, they're hiring Muslim chaplains endorsed by radical Islamic front groups, who convert and radicalize soldiers.”

    Earlier this year, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan reportedly said, "Muslims should stand up and fight the aggressor," referring to the country he swore an oath to serve and protect from domestic enemies like himself. According to IBD, he’s not alone in his thinking:

    • Navy Signalman Hassan Abujihaad last year was convicted of tipping off al-Qaida to battle group movements in the Persian Gulf, including disclosing classified documents detailing the group's vulnerability to terror attack.

    • Army reservist Jeffrey Battle in 2003 pleaded guilty to conspiring to wage war against the U.S., confessing he enlisted "to receive military training to use against America."

    • Army reservist Semi Osman in 2002 was arrested for providing material support to al-Qaida and pleaded guilty to weapons charges after agreeing to testify against other terror suspects.

    • Marine Abdul Raheem al-Arshad Ali trained at a suspected al-Qaida camp and was charged with selling a semi-automatic handgun to Osman.

    • Army Sgt. Ali Mohamed trained Green Berets at Fort Bragg's elite special warfare school before stealing military secrets for al-Qaida and helping plan bombings at three U.S. embassies in 1998.

    • Army Spec. Ryan Anderson in 2004 was convicted of leaking military intelligence to al-Qaida terrorists, including sensitive information about the vulnerabilities of armored Humvees.

    • Army sniper John Muhammad was put on death row after fatally shooting 10 in the nation's capital a year after 9/11.

    Much has changed in our national character since World War II. Our former backbone and courage to stand against tyranny has withered into jelly, while the rest of the world moves closer and closer to mushrooms clouds appearing over major metropolitan cities all over the planet.  

    When the United States entered World War II, Adolf Hitler ordered German saboteurs to wreak havoc on our country.  In June 1942, eight agents were recruited and divided into two teams. On June 12, 1942, U-Boat U-202 landed a team with explosives and plans at East Hampton, Long Island, New York.  Their mission was to destroy power plants at Niagara Falls and three ALCOA factories in Illinois, Tennessee and New York. However, the team leader decided to turn himself in to the FBI, providing them with a complete account of the planned mission, which led to the arrest of the complete team.

    On June 17, 1942, U-Boat U-584 landed at Ponte Vedra Beach with a team tasked with laying mines in the Pennsylvania Railroad in Newark NJ., canals in both St. Louis and Cincinnati, and New York City's water supply lines. The team made their way to Cincinnati, Ohio and split up, with two going to Chicago, Illinois and the others to New York. However, the Dasch confession led to the arrest of all of the men by July 10. All eight were tried and convicted by the Military Commission.  Six were sentenced to death. President Roosevelt approved the sentences.  The constitutionality of the military commissions was upheld by the Supreme Court in Ex parte Quirin and the six were executed by electrocution. 

    Thanks to political correctness and an unwillingness among many of our civilian leaders to do whatever it takes to protect America’s sovereignty, defending ourselves against the “Jihadist’s Fifth Column” residing within our own military is no longer possible. Call it our Achilles heel if you want. Instead of putting these committed jihadists in internment camps, or executing them for treason as would have been done during World War II, we coddle and appease them with special treatment like catering to their faith and “hiring Muslim chaplains endorsed by radical Islamic front groups, who convert and radicalize soldiers.”

    As the ever eloquent Reverend Wright likes to proclaim, these are America’s political correctness chickens coming home to roost. 

    Reference:

     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Our Unconstitutional Government

     
    In his column, “A Tidal Wave Is Brewing,” October 12, 2009, Henry Lamb makes the following observation:  Tidal waves often follow earthquakes. And earthquakes often follow ground tremors. Seismic tremors are being recorded in cities across the nation. In nearly every city where a Democrat had the courage to hold a town meeting, the earth rumbled.”  
     
    On September 12, more than a million people politely paraded through Washington DC, while Democrats and some Republicans chose to look the other way. Next November, these people will take their families, their friends and their neighbors to the polls. “These are the people who are the tidal wave that can clean up the corruption in DC,” says Henry. “These are the people who vote.”

    Every year for the past 15 years, Rep. John Shadegg has been trying to get a bill enacted that would simply require legislators to cite the constitutional authority for any legislation proposed (the Enumerated Powers Act, HR450).  Even though HR450 has 52 co-sponsors, it will never get to a floor vote because the Democrats will not allow it.  

    Coincidently, as Mr. Lamb points out, “This bill would not be necessary if the Democrats would simply follow their own rules. House Rule XIII (3)(d)(1) requires:”
    "Each report of a committee on a public bill or public joint resolution shall contain the following: A statement citing the specific powers granted to Congress in the Constitution to enact the law proposed by the bill or joint resolution."

    Rules of procedure in the House of Representatives are routinely ignored.  Requiring every bill or resolution cite the constitutional authority for the proposed legislation would grind the sausage making of legislation to a halt.  

    Remember when Nancy Pelosi (November 16, 2006) stood on her pedestal and proclaimed: "This leadership team will create the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history,” then set out to ignore House Rule XIII (3)(d)(1)?
     
    “Ignoring a House rule is a minor offense, compared to the corruption that Ms. Pelosi readily accepts when it affects her Democratic colleagues,” says Mr. Lamb.

    Here’s just some of the corruption Nancy continues to reward by her failure to take action:  

    Charles Rangel has failed to report his income from rental property in the Dominican Republic; has used rent-controlled housing facilities for campaign activities to avoid more than $7,000 in rental payments, and much, much more.

    John Murtha provides a treasure trove of investigations into all sorts of abuse of power. Murtha's earmark list contains big rewards for the same companies that appear on his contributions list.

    Maxine Waters completely ignores the conflict of interest rules by using her influence to set up meetings between the Treasury Department and her friends at OneUnited Bank -- which, incidentally, wound up with $12.1 million in bailout funds.

    Mr. Lamb goes on to state, “Corruption is not limited to Democrats, by any means; they just seem to be better at getting away with it.”

    President Obama promised to clean up the corruption in his administration, and then proceeded to appoint people who had failed to pay their taxes, or were caught up in some kind of investigation. Remember his rigid Executive Order outlining a high bar of ethics his appointees would have to meet?  Well he then proceeded to ignore this high bar and waive the requirements for several appointees.

    “It is pure corruption to deliberately give the appearance of high ethical standards, and then completely refuse to apply those standards” says Mr. Lamb. Some people call it “organized crime,” falling under the purview of the RICO Act.  

    Congressmen, who arrogantly refuse to answer questions, want to increase taxes, blindly spend uncountable billions, take over health care, energy and the rest of the market place, are having targets placed on their backs by individuals and organizations all across this land. Mr. Lamb states, “What's needed is a tidal wave to wash over Washington to clean out every politician -- regardless of party affiliation -- who seeks personal power over constitutional compliance or personal profit over public accountability.”

    The only way we can get back to a constitutional form of government is to make sure the people we send to represent us follow the rules that were set up to protect us from totalitarianism. Passing the Enumerated Powers Act, HR450, and enforcing House Rule XIII (3)(d)(1) would be a great place for the new class of representatives to start if the tidal wave elects them into office next November. 
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    What's the difference between a Democracy and a Republic?

    I saw this video on a blog run by Dr. Ignatius Piazza, Founder and Director of Front Sight Firearms Training Institute.
     
    It was posted in response to a video posted by an alleged Marine who is very unhappy with our current form of government, to say the least.

    It is perhaps genuis in its simplicity. So much so, I think even a 3rd grader could understand it.  
     
     
    No wonder this information is no longer taught in public schools.  Just imagine if it were!
     
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »